BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] FS and backuppc performance

2009-03-19 15:32:52
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] FS and backuppc performance
From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:27:18 -0500
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> 
> Backuppc will use all the processor, ram, and disk speed you give it. I've
> not had a box where they weren't all pegged. I tend to limit concurrent
> backups to 2; maybe 3 or 4 on a really high-end box (multiple processors and
> a proven fast disk array); to control disk-head thrashing.

One thing I think is missing from backuppc that amanda has had for years 
is a concept of grouping (or excluding...) by network connectivity.  I 
have a mix of local and remote targets and would like to be able to 
control concurrency to permit 1 or 2 local backups plus separate limits 
for each independent WAN path.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>