Tino Schwarze wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:56:33AM +0100, Matthias Meyer wrote:
>> I use rsyncd to backup my (Windows) clients.
>> The first backup of each client needs a really long time.
>> 
>> Would it be faster if I use smb or tar for the initial backup?
> 
> I'm not sure, but I don't expect it to be faster than rsync. You might
> want to try with one client.

Ok, I will try it (in the next days or weeks). I would believe that it is
faster because they didn't have to compare the files before transmission.

> 
> BTW: What's your setup? Server hardware, client hardware, amount of
> data, network connection?

Server: 2x1,3GHz, 2GB RAM, software raid5, 20MBit download rate.
Clients: Vista and XP (2-3 GHz CPU), more than 20GB data, 1-2MBit upload
rate (and that is my problem ;-)

> 
>> Is it possible to switch back to rsyncd after this initial backup?
> 
> Yes, if you do not change share names, it's all compatible. (Note that
> some excludes might have to be modified - I remember there were some
> subtle differences in file exclusion handling).
> 
>> Would I maintained all the benefits of rsyncd starting with the 2nd
>> backup?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Tino.
> 
Thanks
-- 
Don't Panic


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/