Tim Chipman a écrit :
> check your config file for the specific server in question
> 
> I found this same behaviour, it is if you have a null path at end of
> stanza of paths to backup
> 
> so what it is literally telling you, is that it finished the first
> (real, desired) work
> but failed on the (unwanted, null) work
> 
> hence the confusion
> 
> In my case, I think the null field was appended via the web interface,
> by accident, when I was doing initial config / setup of paths to be
> backed up.  At first I thought it was an rsync issue, but I had
> identical behaviour with "tar" as well.  Lots of fun! :-)
> 
> Took a few weeks before the answer jumped out at me..
> 
> -Tim

Hello Tim,

I will check now.

Thanks

;-)

-- 
Didier



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/