Peter Wright wrote:
> 
> What I was thinking is that if my highest priority was minimising
> bandwidth per backup, why shouldn't I be able to configure backuppc to
> *only* do incrementals and consider them all to be the same "level"?
> 
> 
> But I suspect I've probably misunderstood one or more key backuppc
> principles, especially re: what the "levels" really mean.

Yes, an incremental becomes the next higher level pretty much by definition.

> My key issue is that if I'm interested in bandwidth minimisation above
> all else, why would I want to do anything other than
> incremental-since-the-most-recent-previous-incremental, regardless of
> the "level" concept?

Because for rsync it doesn't make any difference.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/