Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> 
> Which gets me back to the #1 thing that is gnawing me (in a positive
> way) about BackupPC -- which is that it *seems* to be lacking an active
> development engine. There is so much exciting stuff to be done but I
> have yet to figure out how to tap into a group that is active in
> taking this to the next level.

I'm not sure anyone other than Craig really understands the 
rsync-in-perl or the hashing/pooling code well enough to touch it...

But the thing I alway thought should happen was some sort of merge with 
bacula code.  That is, either make backuppc able to talk to bacula's 
client agent, or put backuppc's file pooling code into bacula's disk 
archive handling.

As for fuse, it is a nice idea but I doubt if you'll like the 
performance on operations that have to uncompress the files.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/