Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula
2008-08-12 06:12:03
--On Sunday, July 20, 2008 8:43 PM +0200 "Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)"
<nils AT lemonbit DOT nl> wrote:
> - Bacula uses a Bacula agent on each host you backup, BackupPC uses
> stock rsync(d)/tar/smbclient on the hosts you backup.
This is a case where Bacula has an advantage. (The only one I can
identify.) Because the client is native, it can store the native metadata
(eg. Windows ACLs) more completely.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula,
Kenneth Porter <=
|
|
|