BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula

2008-08-12 06:12:03
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula
From: Kenneth Porter <shiva AT sewingwitch DOT com>
To: backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:11:44 -0700
--On Sunday, July 20, 2008 8:43 PM +0200 "Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" 
<nils AT lemonbit DOT nl> wrote:

> - Bacula uses a Bacula agent on each host you backup, BackupPC uses
> stock rsync(d)/tar/smbclient on the hosts you backup.

This is a case where Bacula has an advantage. (The only one I can 
identify.) Because the client is native, it can store the native metadata 
(eg. Windows ACLs) more completely.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>