Amanda-Users

Re: More ranting about issues compiling 2.6.1 on older machines

2009-03-03 07:32:02
Subject: Re: More ranting about issues compiling 2.6.1 on older machines
From: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
To: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:28:12 -0500
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:24:55PM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM, stan <stanb AT panix DOT com> wrote:
> > I think that most of the new features are conecntrated on teh server end,
> > if I am not mistaken. The last client side enhancement that rose to a
> > visibilty level for me was client side config files, so that you don't ahve
> > to ahe many, many deifernt dumptyes, where the only overide was, say where
> > teh exclude file went. or am I missing something here?
> 
> The major addition on the client side is the Application API.  While
> we could probably patch a minimal client to support client-side
> configuration files, such a minimal client will never support the
> Application API.  But that's OK!

Could you give me a quick description of this?
> 
> Dustin
> 
> P.S. 2.5.0 and later are in Subversion.  The remaining history (some
> of it, at least) is in CVS, and I have a very low-priority TODO task
> (for some night when I can't sleep) to try to graft that onto the git
> history.
> 
Sorry, I am not completly current on source code control systesm (I'm still
stuck with SCCS in places)> So let me get an understanding. Current is in
git, 0.0 -? some version is in CVS, some version to some other version is
in Subversion?

-- 
One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking
zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.