Re: performance of backup process
2008-11-17 08:19:41
Mister Olli wrote:
hi list,
I'm running amanda for some time now, and it really rocks. It's a
totally stable and easy to use backup solution with high reliability.
great work..
since my data volume is increasing, I'm wondering how to speed up the
backup process.
My network includes about 20 clients (mostly *NIX) machines, and one
amanda server which tapes to hard-drives.
I'm wondering how to tune amanda in this scenario? are there any general
hints and tips (beside tuning HD perfomance ;-))
right now I'm looking at the 'amstatus' of my daily backup job, which
gives me the following output
====================================================
Using /var/log/amanda/daily/amdump from Mon Nov 17 08:31:51 CET 2008
172.31.2.10:/daten/business 0 11085m dumping 4380m ( 39.52%)
(8:38:25)
172.31.2.10:/daten/company 1 16m finished (8:38:25)
172.31.2.10:/daten/intern 0 24001m wait for dumping
172.31.2.10:/daten/software 1 242107m wait for dumping
172.31.6.10:/daten/blub 0 1623m finished (8:40:33)
172.31.6.10:/daten/business 1 0m finished (8:37:14)
172.31.6.10:/daten/doku 0 5413m finished (8:45:19)
SUMMARY part real estimated
size size
partition : 7
estimated : 7 284248m
flush : 0 0m
failed : 0 0m ( 0.00%)
wait for dumping: 2 266108m ( 93.62%)
dumping to tape : 0 0m ( 0.00%)
dumping : 1 4380m 11085m ( 39.52%) ( 1.54%)
dumped : 4 7054m 7054m (100.00%) ( 2.48%)
wait for writing: 0 0m 0m ( 0.00%) ( 0.00%)
wait to flush : 0 0m 0m (100.00%) ( 0.00%)
writing to tape : 0 0m 0m ( 0.00%) ( 0.00%)
failed to tape : 0 0m 0m ( 0.00%) ( 0.00%)
taped : 4 7054m 7054m (100.00%) ( 2.48%)
tape 1 : 4 7054m 7054m ( 3.44%) ERNW-daily02
9 dumpers idle : client-constrained
taper writing, tapeq: 0
network free kps: 248976
holding space : 408372m ( 96.12%)
chunker0 busy : 0:00:00 ( 0.00%)
chunker1 busy : 0:00:00 ( 0.00%)
dumper0 busy : 0:05:25 ( 40.25%)
dumper1 busy : 0:08:04 ( 60.00%)
taper busy : 0:04:12 ( 31.21%)
0 dumpers busy : 0:05:23 ( 40.04%) not-idle: 0:05:23
(100.00%)
1 dumper busy : 0:03:36 ( 26.79%) client-constrained: 0:02:25
( 67.29%)
start-wait: 0:01:10
( 32.71%)
2 dumpers busy : 0:04:27 ( 33.15%) client-constrained: 0:04:27
(100.00%)
====================================================
from my understanding amanda is dumping (writing to holding disk) and
taping (writing from holding disk to virtual tapes) at the same time.
Doesn't this reduce speed on the dumper caused by the head-seeks on the
holding disc? Is there a way to prevent this scenario (as long as the
holding disc is big enough for all data that belongs to the job)?
There are some tips here:
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/How_To:Set_Up_Virtual_Tapes.
In particular, if you have a holding disk and your virtual tapes on the
same disk or raid, it is going to degrade performance.
--
---------------
Chris Hoogendyk
-
O__ ---- Systems Administrator
c/ /'_ --- Biology & Geology Departments
(*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst
<hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
---------------
Erdös 4
|
|
|