Amanda-Users

Re: amtapetype - silly thing I tried

2007-06-01 10:42:00
Subject: Re: amtapetype - silly thing I tried
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: Jon LaBadie <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:40:38 -0400
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:00:21AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> Jon,
> 
> amtapetype should terminate once it fill the disk.
> 
> Jean-Louis

I didn't see any smiley there ;) so I'll just note that once
amtapetype seemed to recognize the file driver I half-expected
it to also see the EOF like taper does.

jl

> 
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >Back to back posts to the list on amtapetype and the file:driver
> >made me wonder, will amtapetype work with virtual tapes?  Not
> >that it would be of any benefit, just wondered if it would.
> >
> >Well, to my surprise, amtapetype does "seem to work" with vtapes.
> >But ...
> >
> >It recognized the slot and "amanda tape" in the slot,
> >refusing to go on.
> >It could be forced to overwrite the "amanda tape" in the slot
> >with the -f option.
> >It did its compression test.
> >It wrote its files to the virtual tape slot.
> >And wrote and wrote and wrote.
> >
> >I.e. unlike amdump/amflush that appear to see a pseudo EOF
> >when their writing reached the 14GB size listed in the
> >tapetype definition (and the estimate, -e option),
> >amtapetype never sees the EOF.  Of course it is trying
> >to figure out what that size limit is supposed to be,
> >so maybe it is reasonable that it never got an EOF ;)
> >
> >Not sure which surprised me most, that it started and worked
> >well, or that it did not end normally.
> >
> >  
> 
> 
>>> End of included message <<<

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>