Amanda-Users

Re: More "timeout waiting for ACK" amcheck problems resolved

2006-11-21 17:55:57
Subject: Re: More "timeout waiting for ACK" amcheck problems resolved
From: "Florian Lengyel" <lengyel AT gmail DOT com>
To: "Jean-Louis Martineau" <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:44:58 -0500
Well, yes, you're right. tcpd is supposed to work transparently, but in this case it was
more opaque.
 
Do you have any suggestions on this, beyond RTFM?
 
Thanks,
FL

 
On 11/21/06, Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com> wrote:
A better advice is to configure tcpd instead of removing it.

Jean-Louis

Florian Lengyel wrote:
> FYI:
>
> I was getting an amcheck ACK timeout error:
>
> Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
> ------------------------------
> --
> WARNING: wilf: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK
> Client check: 1 host checked in 30.002 seconds, 1 problem found
>
> (brought to you by Amanda 2.5.1p1)
>
> I'm using the above version of AMANDA on a Debian system (unstable
> release).
>
> This was uninspiring, as the AMANDA client and server are on the
> same machine! I did have a quick fix, that isn't mentioned in the
> AMANDA wiki,
> so I will email the list with it.
>
>
>
> The Debian apt-get installer appends the following line to /etc/inetd.conf
>
> amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
>
> I removed the /usr/sbin/tcpd argument,
>
> amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
>
> restarted inetd and was rewarded with:
>
> backup@wilf:~$ amcheck Daily
> Amanda Tape Server Host Check
> -----------------------------
> Holding disk /home/amanda: 106289492 KB disk space available, using
> 105265492 KBslot 1: read label `Daily-01', date `X'
> NOTE: skipping tape-writable test
> Tape Daily-01 label ok
> Server check took 0.820 seconds
>
> Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
> --------------------------------
> Client check: 1 host checked in 0.026 seconds, 0 problems found
>
> (brought to you by Amanda 2.5.1p1 )
>
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>