Amanda-Users

"failed" dumps still taping

2006-08-04 10:38:40
Subject: "failed" dumps still taping
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: Jon LaBadie <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:30:19 -0400
Is it normal for a DLE listed as "failed" under
"FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:" to still be taped?

I'm having different DLE's exhibit failure, perhaps
three times a week.  Reasons are not always timeout
like the one shown below.  But one thing struck me
about most of them, the detailed report for the
DLE still showed a lot of data dumped and taped;
in some cases enough to seem to be all that I'd expect.

I don't remember in my old installation having a dump
fail while in progress, so perhaps I'm seeing normal
behavior and never experienced it before.

Here is the one from last night.  It is an indirect
windows client.  But I've had similar results from
direct Solaris and linux clients too, including the
amanda host.  I don't think they were all data timeouts,
but I'd have to go back and check.


FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
...
  bigcow  LastChanceC  lev 0  FAILED [data timeout]
  bigcow  LastChanceC  lev 0  STRANGE


FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:

/--  bigcow LastChanceC lev 0 FAILED [data timeout]
sendbackup: start [bigcow:LastChanceC level 0]
...
? NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION opening remote file \Documents and ...
\--------


NOTES:
  planner: Incremental of bigcow:LastChanceC bumped to level 4.
  planner: Full dump of bigcow:LastChanceC promoted from 1 day ahead.


DUMP SUMMARY:
                                    DUMPER STATS          TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISK       L ORIG-MB OUT-MB COMP% MMM:SS   KB/s MMM:SS    KB/s
------------------- ------------------------------------ --------------
...
bigcow   LastChanceC 0   8549   5978  69.9  66:12 1541.1   6:00 16996.6

 

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>