Amanda-Users

Re: incremental backups

2006-05-31 09:16:53
Subject: Re: incremental backups
From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>
To: Edson <edsonc.silva AT incor.usp DOT br>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:10:35 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 31 May 2006 at 9:45am, Edson wrote

My intention is perfom a backup schema in 6x1 (6 incremental and 1 full backup) using a LTO tape drive (200gb). My target system is a "ext3" partition (/home) in a Suse Linux 9.3 box called "alpes", with less than 50gb of size (mailserver).
Current Im using the "tar-excl".

Using amanda as it's meant to be used means giving up on the traditional *nix thinking about scheduling backups. You let amanda schedule fulls and incrementals, not you.

Also, looking at the amanda.conf you posted, there are some fundamental errors. 'dumpcycle 0' forces amanda to do a full dump (level 0) every time you run 'amdump'. Also, tapecycle must be >= dumpcycle.

Stop. Read the documentation. Understand it. Run more test dumps. Then come on back with any questions you still have.

--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>