On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:25:02AM -0700, Mike Delaney wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:41:54AM -0400, stan wrote:
> > I'm starting to upgrade my clients. The HP-UX boxes (10.20) went flawlessly.
> >
> > But I'm having a few issues with my first Solaris 8 machine. Now in the
> > interest of full disclosure, these machines are "supported" by a 3rd party
> > OEM, and the machine I use for a build machine was recently "rebuilt" by
> > them to address a kernel memory leak issue, so odds are good what I'm
> > seeing is a result of their meddling, but I could use some help figuring
> > this out.
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > My first amcheck failed. I tried to run amandad by hand, and found that the
> > dynamic linker was failing to find libgcc_s.so.1. I looked in .cshrc and
> > .profile, and found that they had broken LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I fixed this,
> > restarted inetd, and was able to run an amcheck. So far so good.
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH is at best a kludge. Needing to use it is always a sign
> that something's broken. (Having a 537 character PATH generally is, as
> well.)
>
> > But, the next backups from this machine failed, and when I look in the
> > debug file, I find this:
> >
> > ld.so.1: /opt/amanda/libexec/noop: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No
> > such file or directory
> >
> > I'm a bit confused by what sets up the search path for shared libraries
> > under Solaris 8, when they are invoked as services like Amanda does. Is
> > there a way to give the binaries a hard coded search path?
>
> Yes, pass the -R/path/to/library flag to the linker at build time. For
> Solaris systems, every -L given to the linker should have a corresponding
> -R. libgcc_s.so.1 is a bit of a special case, since gcc is implicitly
> linking that one in when needed. Figure out where it lives and pass
> the appropriate -R option via LDFLAGS when building.
>
OK, should I manual add this to te Makefiles? Or is there a way to tell
configure this? Perhaps an environment variable?
--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967
|
