Backupdisk was just a dummy-name. The true name is an other. It's a
smb-share with office-files on it. I'm sure the users did not touch them
all... Perhaps any running process??? Other smb-shares from the same hosts
don't have this problem.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org [mailto:owner-amanda-users AT amanda 
DOT org] Im
Auftrag von Jon LaBadie
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 16:07
An: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Betreff: Re: no different dumpsize between level 0 and 1

On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:17:10PM +0100, Rainer Hackel wrote:
> Here an abstract of tho mail reports amanda send after a backup. The 
> first time it makes dumplevel 0 of backupdisk. The second time it 
> makes dumplevel
> 1 of the same disk. Why differs the size that less? Looks more like if 
> both were complete backups. Someone can help?
> 
> -backupdisk 0 20166900 20166900 -- 104:513205.5 39:518434.9
> 
> -backupdisk 1 20223440 20223440 -- 93:013623.6 38:498683.2


First question has to be, have most of the things on 'backupdisk'
changed since the level 0?

Might something be causing the ctime of each file to be altered so it looks
like it has changed?

What is on 'backupdisk'?  Is it, as the name suggests, backups?
If so, are you backing up your backups?

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.4 - Release Date: 01.02.2005