|
Antwort: Re: Incredible slow write / Converting tapes
2005-01-11 08:59:10
Hi Stefan,
errrm, stupid and confused as I was
I actually changed it to 32 bytes (!), but now I corrected it, setting
a value of 32768.
Sorry for messing this up. I now started
a new try with this setting. My fault, that I didn´t made a written notice
when I changed the blocksize on the old machine.
Now I hope, it will run as good as it
used to before I changed the hardware.
Resulting from the several tries, I
now have several tapes labeled with various blocksizes. How can I convert
them back to the correct one. I assume amlabel won´t do it, cause when
I tried, it is not able to read the tape header.
Again sorry for my confusing posts,
but I am working on this quite a few days and the more I try the more confused
I get.
Kind regards
Sandra Krumme
"Stefan G. Weichinger"
<monitor AT oops.co DOT at>
Gesendet von: owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
11.01.2005 14:27
|
Bitte antworten zu
amanda-users AT amanda DOT org |
|
|
An
| amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
|
|
Kopie
|
|
|
Thema
| Re: Incredible slow write
/ Converting tapes |
|
Hi, Paul,
on Dienstag, 11. Jänner 2005 at 14:14 you wrote to amanda-users:
>> These problems I had resolved by using fresh tapes and by setting
the
>> default block size of the tape device to 32, which was the original
>> setting.
PB> blocksize of 32 bytes? Or do you mean 32 Kbytes?
PB> If the blocksize if 32 bytes, then, yes, that is incredebly slow.
Errrm, yes ...
--
best regards,
Stefan
Stefan G. Weichinger
mailto:monitor AT oops.co DOT at
|
|
|
