RE: Problem with amflush
2004-02-02 04:33:21
John LaBadie wrotes:
> That report suggests to me that there were no "partitions" to dump.
>
> You noted it has been running for an hour. When I run amflush,
> there is an interactive Q&A session that, after I give the final
> confirmation, shifts amflush to the background noting it will send
> me a mail message when completed. Is that what you saw too?
Yes, if i start amflush without -f option, then he asks me this way and I
see the same output.
> Did you get a mail message? What were its contents?
"amflush failed" or something like this. This don't make me wonder, because
I killed the amflush-process. I needed the taper for the next backup at
night and wanted to leave off work ;-).
> Do you have things to flush? amflush, during the Q&A, shows what
> amdumps might be available for flushing. If you go to the holding
> disk, are there files for dumping there?
Maybe that's the problem. There are not really flushable things. But why is
there no error-message and it runs and runs and runs and runs ...? This make
me worry. Our amanda-version is 2.4.3-4.
> Do you think that you have something to flush because an amdump
> report said (IIRC) "some dumps MAY have been left in the
> holding disk".
> Note that "MAY", it is a key word. There 'may not' have been anything
> left either. At the point amanda adds that info to the amdump report
> it can't tell.
>
> Did you run an amdump since the problem run? I ask as there is an
> "autoflush" option in amanda.conf that causes anything that needs
> flushing to be flushed at the start of the next amdump run.
The autoflush-option is set to "no", because we would have problems with our
backup-strategy.
Thanks for help. I will see, how amanda works next times.
Best regards
Bernd
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: Problem with amflush,
Postaremczak Bernd <=
|
|
|