Amanda-Users

Re: Urgent help needed, degraded mode, tapes too small ?

2004-01-27 12:05:09
Subject: Re: Urgent help needed, degraded mode, tapes too small ?
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: AMANDA <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:01:08 -0500
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 05:52:25PM +0100, Oliver Simon wrote:
> Hi again ...
> 
> Am Di, 2004-01-27 um 16.43 schrieb Jon LaBadie:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:32:06PM +0100, Oliver Simon wrote:
> > > Hi Group !
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This smorning we got the problem, that many servers were backuped in
> > > "degraded mode (host /disk lev 1 FAILED)". I think this means, the
> > > defined hdd-tapes became too small, right ?
> > > 
> > > 1) We have 17 tapes defined each one with 75000 MB. 
> > > Can I expand this to 100000 MB without loosing the current backups ?
> > 
> > Stefan provided answers, I'm curious though.
> > 
> > Each of your "vtapes" is 75GB.  From your past experience in the
> > amdump reports, how full have they been?  If they have regularly
> > been half or more, say 40GB/amdump run, does your total disk
> > storage allocated for vtapes support this?  I.e. it will take
> > perhaps 17*40GB or 680GB total for your collection of vtapes.
> > Of course now that you are filling 75GB vtapes, and considering
> > making them 100GB, will you be allocating a terrabyte of disk
> > storage to your vtapes?
> 
> Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sdb1             1.3T 1006G  254G  80% /r01
> /dev/sdc1             2.8T  611G  2.2T  24% /r02 ---> DailySet1 
> /dev/sdd1             2.0T  1.3T  712G  65% /r03
> 
> 
> > I guess what I'm driving at, is your problem that 75GB per vtape
> > is too small or is the "total" storage capacity too small.  Did
> > the file system run out of space?
> 
> Nope, I don´t think so ...

Gee, and I thought my home system had a lot of disk storage :))

Given the above, I wonder about your limits.  Perhaps you have a
reason to set the max size of each vtape to 75 or 100GB, but just
to make certain there is no misunderstanding.  Space for vtapes of
those sizes are 'not' allocated, just they are permitted to grow
to those sizes if needed.  Why not reset the length parameter to
200, or 500, or 1000GB?  It will not use any more space than is
needed by the dump, but might prevent surprises like last night.

jl
-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>