Amanda-Users

Re: VERY high load on server

2004-01-07 14:41:19
Subject: Re: VERY high load on server
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
To: Mike Heller <mike AT dsny DOT com>, amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:40:06 -0500
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 13:21, Mike Heller wrote:
>I have amanda running on serveral servers and last night I tried to
> back up one more to the tape server.  When I arrived this morning,
> the backups were still running and the new server had an extremely
> high load on it.  It's a RedHat Linux 9.0 server and the load was
> over 520 (quad Xeon system).  There were about 1500 processes with
> "amanda" as the user, some are listed below:

Why is it running restore?  You said it was backing up, aka amdump..

>amanda    4030  4028  3 01:03 ?        00:17:00 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4031  4028  0 01:03 ?        00:01:47 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4046     1  0 01:05 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4048  4046  3 01:05 ?        00:18:16 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4049  4046  0 01:05 ?        00:01:56 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4057     1  0 01:05 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4059  4057  3 01:05 ?        00:17:47 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4060  4057  0 01:05 ?        00:01:53 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4077     1  0 01:06 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4079  4077  3 01:06 ?        00:16:05 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4080  4077  0 01:06 ?        00:01:42 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4107     1  0 01:08 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4108  4107  3 01:08 ?        00:14:35 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4114  4107  0 01:08 ?        00:01:34 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4121     1  0 01:09 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4123  4121  3 01:09 ?        00:14:04 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4128  4121  0 01:09 ?        00:01:32 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4134     1  0 01:09 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4136  4134  2 01:09 ?        00:13:13 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4137  4134  0 01:09 ?        00:01:24 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4145     1  0 01:09 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4147  4145  2 01:09 ?        00:12:26 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4150  4145  0 01:09 ?        00:01:19 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4169     1  0 01:11 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4170  4169  2 01:11 ?        00:13:14 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4172  4169  0 01:11 ?        00:01:25 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4181     1  0 01:11 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4186  4181  2 01:11 ?        00:11:49 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4187  4181  0 01:11 ?        00:01:15 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4210     1  0 01:12 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4212  4210  2 01:12 ?        00:11:08 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4213  4210  0 01:12 ?        00:01:09 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4227     1  0 01:14 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4228  4227  2 01:14 ?        00:12:04 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4229  4227  0 01:14 ?        00:01:19 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4239     1  0 01:14 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4241  4239  2 01:14 ?        00:12:08 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4242  4239  0 01:14 ?        00:01:17 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>amanda    4259     1  0 01:15 ?        00:00:00 sh -c /sbin/restore
> -tvf - 2>&1
>amanda    4260  4259  2 01:15 ?        00:11:56 /sbin/restore -tvf -
>amanda    4262  4259  0 01:15 ?        00:01:16 sed -e ?s/^leaf[
>?]*[0-9]*[ ?]*\
>
>That is only a small sample.  I have not seen this on any other
> server before and I'm not sure what is causing it.  Tonight I'm
> going to try and backup another directory from that server that is
> less than 10 MB in size to see if it completes without problems.
>
>Can anyone tell me what may be happening?  Would filling the tape on
> the tape server cause this?
>
>Any help appreciated,
>Mike

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>