Amanda-Users

Re: gtar always doing fulls with --listed-incremental even if level > 0 ?

2003-12-24 10:55:02
Subject: Re: gtar always doing fulls with --listed-incremental even if level > 0 ?
From: Scott Mcdermott <smcdermott AT questra DOT com>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 10:52:11 -0500
Gene Heskett on Wed 24/12 10:47 -0500:
> AFAIK, samba doesn't support those times.  So you will, if
> samba is the transport from client to server, get a full
> backup of everything everytime.  Or at least thats been my
> experience with the samba 2.x family, and I have not yet
> installed 3.0, based on the if it ain't broke, don't fix
> it theory.  To me, what I use samba for isn't broke.  But
> I sure don't let it get in an amanda path, for exactly
> that reason.
> 
> But thats an interesting linkage, doing it all on the same
> machine.  IF I understand correctly.  However, just
> exporting the filesystem with samba should not affect a
> properly installed amanda.

I guess I wasn't clear.  I'm not using SAMBA at all in
relation to Amanda.  I just happen to be exporting the
filesystem I'm backing up via SAMBA.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>