Paul Bijnens wrote:
> This directive would be needed by a client, and currently a client
> does not need a configuration file.

Could it not be supplied from the server to the client, as I believe
the "exclude list" option is?

> The other reason is that no-one submitted a patch (for a seperate
> optional configuration file used by client programs).

Personally, I like the idea that all the config is done in one
place (on the server). As far as submitted patches; if there's
no way to do what we want to do, then I guess we'll be working
on one... :-)