Re: Tape labelling and strategy
2002-11-29 12:08:06
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:55:47AM +0000, Niall O Broin wrote:
> On Friday 29 November 2002 09:16, marc.bigler AT day DOT com wrote:
>
> dumpcycle 7 days
> runspercycle 5
> tapecycle 40 (or however many tapes you have)
> runtapes 2
>
> and then you simply label your tapes (physically and with amlabel) mysite01
> to
> mysite40 (rather than 00-39 - easier for humans, and amanda doesn't care)
>
> With runspercycle 5 and runtapes 2 a "complete set" of tapes is anyway not
> 8
> but rather ten.
Semantic comment. "complete set" is a rather ephemeral value.
As runtapes is a maximum number allowed, not the number which will be
actually used, each complete set could be anywhere between 5 and 10 tapes
depending on whether 1 or 2 tapes were used any particular run.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
|
|