RE: statistics
2002-09-04 19:03:32
yes - that's right. the slow part is your computer compressing the data. The
"offline" message is a "yet to be crafted" question for this list - amanda
isn't backing up the reiserfs partition on one of the machines. The drive is
a SDLT110, there are 3 servers, and a dedicated 40G holding disk. After
setting it up this way, the performance of amanda skyrocketed (by having a
dedicated holding disk, fast backup drive, one server getting multiple
clients to do client-side compression).
Cheers,
Chris
------------------------------------------------------------------
These dumps were to tape Loyalty003.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: Loyalty004.
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
diablo /dev/hde1 lev 0 FAILED [disk /dev/hde1 offline on diablo?]
STATISTICS:
Total Full Daily
-------- -------- --------
Estimate Time (hrs:min) 0:04
Run Time (hrs:min) 6:51
Dump Time (hrs:min) 9:09 8:47 0:22
Output Size (meg) 19111.8 16576.7 2535.1
Original Size (meg) 35566.2 31388.3 4177.9
Avg Compressed Size (%) 53.7 52.8 60.7 (level:#disks ...)
Filesystems Dumped 12 11 1 (1:1)
Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 594.5 536.8 1994.5
Tape Time (hrs:min) 0:34 0:30 0:04
Tape Size (meg) 19112.2 16577.1 2535.2
Tape Used (%) 18.6 16.1 2.5 (level:#disks ...)
Filesystems Taped 12 11 1 (1:1)
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 9584.5 9556.1 9775.1
NOTES:
planner: Adding new disk diablo:/dev/hde1.
planner: Full dump of gemini:/dev/sda5 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sdc1 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sda4 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of gemini:/dev/sda6 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sdb1 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sda3 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of gemini:/dev/sda3 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of gemini:/dev/sda1 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of bob:/dev/sda1 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of diablo:/dev/hda3 promoted from 1 day ahead.
planner: Full dump of diablo:/dev/hda1 promoted from 1 day ahead.
taper: tape Loyalty003 kb 19570912 fm 12 [OK]
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATS TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
-------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------
bob /dev/sda1 0 1636282 490848 30.0 32:19 253.1 0:558997.6
bob /dev/sda3 0 132318 27328 20.7 2:36 175.3 0:0216471.5
bob /dev/sda4 0 1241536 786336 63.3 6:302016.4 1:219731.9
bob /dev/sdb1 0 1157677 577760 49.9 22:47 422.6 1:019507.0
bob /dev/sdc1 0 79762334850560 60.8 39:502029.8 8:139831.1
bob /dev/sdd1 1 42781942595968 60.7 21:421994.5 4:269775.0
diablo /dev/hda1 0 2113691 919424 43.5 30:23 504.4 1:438910.0
diablo /dev/hda3 0 30202 4672 15.5 0:17 269.1 0:014178.1
diablo /dev/hde1 0 FAILED ---------------------------------------
gemini /dev/sda1 0 1717516 557536 32.5 123:15 75.4 1:088226.4
gemini /dev/sda3 0 953407 280096 29.4 27:42 168.5 0:446435.9
gemini /dev/sda5 0 139187958458624 60.8 211:53 665.4 14:239803.3
gemini /dev/sda6 0 1263950 21376 1.7 29:29 12.1 0:073192.7
(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.2p2)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org [mailto:owner-amanda-users AT amanda
DOT org]On
Behalf Of greg
Sent: Friday, 6 September 2002 08:30
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Subject: statistics
Does this look right?
STATISTICS:
Total Full Daily
-------- -------- --------
Estimate Time (hrs:min) 0:06
Run Time (hrs:min) 11:48
Dump Time (hrs:min) 11:42 11:42 0:01
Output Size (meg) 24171.4 24171.4 0.0
Original Size (meg) 54320.4 54318.3 2.1
Avg Compressed Size (%) 44.5 44.5 1.5 (level:#disks ...)
Filesystems Dumped 3 2 1 (1:1)
Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 587.4 588.0 0.8
Tape Time (hrs:min) 11:41 11:41 0:00
Tape Size (meg) 24171.5 24171.5 0.1
Tape Used (%) 64.5 64.5 0.0 (level:#disks ...)
Filesystems Taped 3 2 1 (1:1)
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 588.5 588.5 29.3
It is saying it took 11 hrs to dump 54GB or 24GB compressed. I have a
quantum DLT8000-40 which is rated
at 6MB/s or 12MB/s compressed. 11hrs seems a long time even considering
gzip as the software compression.
Is there something I am missing here?
-greg
|
|
|