Amanda-Users

Re: New tapetype definition

2002-08-27 18:05:36
Subject: Re: New tapetype definition
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:52:38 -0400
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:28:31PM -0700, Bill Wagner wrote:
> I've run 'tapetype' to generate a new definition for my Compaq
> Storageworks SSL2020 / Overland AIT LibraryPro and wanted to share my
> findings.  It ran for more than four hours, so hopefully this is accurate:
> 
> wrote 7208 32Kb blocks in 1 file
> wrote 1391144 32Kb blocks in 193 files in 7997 seconds (short write)
> wrote 1394748 32Kb blocks in 387 files in 7998 seconds (short write)
> define tapetype AIT-2 {
>     comment "just produced by tapetype program"
>     length 43529 mbytes
>     filemark 0 kbytes
>     speed 5573 kps
> }
> 
> I ran this against /dev/st0 (Linux) but someone gave me an example using
> the non-rewinding device file.  Does it matter against which it was run?

What were you expecting to be the "uncompressed" capacity.
About 44 or 45GB?  If not, but something like 50 or 60GB,
you may have incorrectly run tapetype with hardware
compression turned on.  It should be off.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>