Re: How to determine cause of Amanda slowdown?
2002-08-08 12:43:29
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002 at 12:15pm, KEVIN ZEMBOWER wrote
> admin:/proc/net # ifconfig eth0
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:90:27:B6:FB:E7
> inet addr:172.16.2.7 Bcast:172.16.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:259376827 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:188989102 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> carrier:65070
> collisions:54220248 txqueuelen:100
> RX bytes:2574728265 (2455.4 Mb) TX bytes:2729800656 (2603.3
> Mb)
>
> This is the system on the 100Base-T line connected directly to a Cisco
> switch, which should be set at full duplex. Does the fact that they're
> any collisions at all indicate that this is not working in full duplex
> mode? The collisions are 21% of the number of RX packets, and 28% of the
> TX packets. Are these numbers excessive?
Yes. You shouldn't have collisions.
> At one time I knew of a program or command that you could run to
> display the settings of the NIC, like auto-negotiate and so forth. For
> the life of me I can remember it now. Any suggestions for determining
> this information?
It depends on the NIC. Don Becker has diagnostic tools for all sorts of
NICs:
http://www.scyld.com/diag/index.html
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
|
|
|