ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] ndmp

2017-08-01 17:29:19
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] ndmp
From: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSON DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 21:27:06 +0000
You might be better off having proxy systems access the NAS contents using CIFS 
and/or NFS, and having the proxy systems use the backup/archive client to back 
up the NAS contents.

My department supports Commvault as well as TSM (the result of a merger of 
previously separate IT organizations). The Commvault workload includes a NAS 
server on the same scale as yours. Our Commvault representative advised us to 
forget about Commvault's NDMP support and use the Commvault analog of the 
approach described in the previous paragraph.

The subject of NAS backup coverage arose at an IBM training/marketing event for 
the Spectrum family of products. The IBM representative who responded was not 
as bluntly dismissive of NDMP as our Commvault representative, but he sounded 
decidedly unenthusiastic when he mentioned NDMP as a possible approach to NAS 
backups.

Thomas Denier,
Thomas Jefferson University

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Remco Post
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 16:41
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] ndmp

Hi all,

I’m working on a large TSM implementation for a customer who also has HDS NAS 
systems, and quite some data in those systems, more than 100 TB that needs to 
be backed up. We were planning to go 100% directory container for the new 
environment, but alas IBM’s “best of both worlds" (DISK & FILE) doesn’t support 
NDMP and I don’t like FILE with deduplication (too much of a hassle), so is it 
really true, are we really stuck with tape? ISn’t it about time after so many 
years that IBM finally gives us a decent solution to backup NAS systems?

--

 Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.post AT plcs DOT nl
+31 6 248 21 622
The information contained in this transmission contains privileged and 
confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

CAUTION: Intended recipients should NOT use email communication for emergent or 
urgent health care matters.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC