ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Fine tuning INCLUDE/EXCLUDE and EXCLUDE.DIR

2016-08-26 16:14:06
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Fine tuning INCLUDE/EXCLUDE and EXCLUDE.DIR
From: "Vandeventer, Harold [OITS]" <Harold.Vandeventer AT KS DOT GOV>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:12:31 +0000
Thanks Bob.  As a first update, I'll have the client add the various 
EXCLUDE.DIR statements.

I'm betting there isn't a "wildcard" just in case a new folder appears that we 
DON'T want to backup.

Thanks again.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Robert Talda
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 1:40 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Fine tuning INCLUDE/EXCLUDE and EXCLUDE.DIR

Harold:
   For what is worth, been there, done this.

  Yes, adding the EXCLUDE.DIR statements will improve backup performance - 
AFTER the first backup, during which the client will tell the server to expire 
all the files and folders that are no longer backed up.  If you delete the 
filespace first, then you avoid this performance hit - but you lose the older 
data already stored in TSM (which I’m sure you know).  We’ve let customers 
choose, because they better than we do the value of that older data..

Hope this helps
Bob


Robert Talda
EZ-Backup Systems Engineer
Cornell University
+1 607-255-8280
rpt4 AT cornell DOT edu


> On Aug 26, 2016, at 2:21 PM, Vandeventer, Harold [OITS] <Harold.Vandeventer 
> AT KS DOT GOV> wrote:
>
> One of my clients has a server running ImageNow.  There are millions of files 
> and several thousand folders that take over 24 hours for the daily 
> incremental.
>
> My goal is to backup a single ImageNow folder and reduce the elapsed time to 
> traverse thousands of folders that don't need to be backed up.
>
> We worked out a setup for a new node in an effort to backup only a given path 
> within the ImageNow structure.
>
> The following dsm.opt statements are in place:
> DOMAIN J:
> EXCLUDE J:\...\*
> INCLUDE J:\IMAGENOW\SUBOB_OSM\...\*
>
> That was successful in backing up only the files and subfolders/files in 
> SUBOB_OSM.  But it also backed up thousands of directories on J:\.  Most of 
> them are in the \IMAGENOW path.
>
> My plan is to add a few EXCLUDE.DIR statements such as:
> EXCLUDE.DIR J:\IMAGENOW\54_OSM
> EXCLUDE.DIR J:\IMAGENOW\DEFAULT_OSM
>
> The question:  will adding EXCLUDE.DIR now, after the node has backed up all 
> those paths, result in a performance improvement?
>
> I suspect Spectrum Protect server will send all the directory names to the 
> node, but hopefully the work on the node side will be much faster.
>
> Or, will we need to delete the filespace, then start over with a fresh 
> "incremental forever" backup to clear out all that directory structure?
>
> Thanks.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Harold Vandeventer
> Office of Information Technology Services
> 2800 SW Topeka Blvd
> Topeka, KS 66611
> (785) 296-0631
> Harold.Vandeventer AT ks DOT gov | www.oits.ks.gov
>



CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE NOTICE
This e-mail message, including attachments, if any, is intended for the person 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged 
information. Any unauthorized review, use, or disclosure is prohibited. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the 
original message, including all copies, Thank you.