ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ADSM-L] SUN CMT servers vs UltraSPARC for TSM

2008-11-19 10:13:27
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SUN CMT servers vs UltraSPARC for TSM
From: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:12:07 -0500 
>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:54:39 +0100, Hans Christian Riksheim <HCR AT STERIA 
>> DOT NO> said:


> We are speculating whether we should employ the latest CMT-server
> from SUN as TSM-servers. The CMT-servers are many cores/many threads
> but each thread is relatively slow(1,2/1,4 GHz) compared to Ultra
> Sparc(2,3Ghz).

What other architectures are you considering?  There's been recent
disvcusion about this on the list, but I'd put Sun close to the bottom
of my TSM architecture preferences.  AIX first, then Windows (because
it's popular now), then Linux (because it's popular tomorrow).

As much as it pains me to put Win in front of Linux... :)

But really, AIX is preferable if at all possible.


- Allen S. Rout
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [ADSM-L] ?? TDP for DBs - does it support SQL Express?, Laughlin, Lisa
Next by Date:  Re: [ADSM-L] SUN CMT servers vs UltraSPARC for TSM, Hans Christian Riksheim
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ADSM-L] SUN CMT servers vs UltraSPARC for TSM, Remco Post
Next by Thread:  Re: [ADSM-L] SUN CMT servers vs UltraSPARC for TSM, Hans Christian Riksheim
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]