ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] SUN CMT servers vs UltraSPARC for TSM

2008-11-19 10:01:29
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SUN CMT servers vs UltraSPARC for TSM
From: Eric Bourgi <eric.bourgi AT DOWCORNING DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:59:43 +0100
Could you specify which server you are looking at ?
We are running all our tsm servers on SUN and FJ PrimePower

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Hans Christian Riksheim
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:55 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: SUN CMT servers vs UltraSPARC for TSM

Hello, list.

We are speculating whether we should employ the latest CMT-server from
SUN as TSM-servers. The CMT-servers are many cores/many threads but each
thread is relatively slow(1,2/1,4 GHz) compared to Ultra Sparc(2,3Ghz).

My question is if TSM benefits from many threads or if we should go for
single thread performance. I guess expiration is a single thread process
but that depends mainly on IO. Maybe many simultanious client operations
would benefit from many threads. How about TSM version 6?

I really don't know here.


Any thoughts?



Regards

Hans Chr.

This email originates from Steria AS, Biskop Gunnerus' gate 14a, N-0051 OSLO, 
http://www.steria.no. This email and any attachments may contain 
confidential/intellectual property/copyright information and is only for the 
use of the addressee(s). You are prohibited from copying, forwarding, 
disclosing, saving or otherwise using it in any way if you are not the 
addressee(s) or responsible for delivery. If you receive this email by mistake, 
please advise the sender and cancel it immediately. Steria may monitor the 
content of emails within its network to ensure compliance with its policies and 
procedures. Any email is susceptible to alteration and its integrity cannot be 
assured. Steria shall not be liable if the message is altered, modified, 
falsified, or even edited.