Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives
2008-11-19 10:02:58
>> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:35:49 -0500, Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>
>> said:
> At 02:38 PM 11/17/2008, Wanda Prather wrote:
>> No reason I know of you can't have an auto script that does update vol *
>> wherestgpool=copypool access=offsite every day before you start your
>> reclaims.
> Seems like if I did this, all the output would have to go to newly
> allocated scratch tapes.
Right, so you'd need to set them back to local in time for the next
day's traffic. That's why I said "Micromanage". :)
> No tapes in filling status would be used.
> I could only update the full volumes, I suppose, but are there cases
> where filling tapes can be reclaimed?
Yes.
- Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, (continued)
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, Wanda Prather
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, Wanda Prather
- Message not available
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, Fred Johanson
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, Thomas Denier
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, Allen S. Rout
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, Thomas Denier
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, Allen S. Rout
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives,
Allen S. Rout <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] Remote tape drives, Paul Zarnowski
|
|
|