ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Vista oddness

2007-12-07 11:26:12
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Vista oddness
From: Wanda Prather <wprather AT JASI DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 11:23:59 -0500
The XP system state is about 300MB, much like a Win2K system.
It's Vista where the weirdness kicks in...


On 12/7/07, Tyree, David <david.tyree AT sgmc DOT org> wrote:
>
> I did a backup using the GUI and selected system state along with the C:
> drive. The backup was 8 gig when it finished.
>
> I went back and did a C: drive only and it was only a few hundred meg.
> Then I did a system state only and got the 8 gig again.
>
> That system state in Vista is just crazy. I need to go back and really
> look at some of my servers and see just how big the system state backups
> are. I'll also take a close look at a few Win XP Pro desktops that I'm
> backing up and see what the numbers look like.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of
> Wanda Prather
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 2:35 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Vista oddness
>
> Don't know myself, but someone else posted a while back that the System
> State on Vista is many GB.
>
> That is consistent with what you are seeing - a scheduled backup will do
> the
> System State, whether things have changed or not.  And selecting the C:
> drive will not do the system state.
>
> As a test, try your backup from thh GUI again, but this time select
> System
> STate as well as the C: drive, see if the results change...
>
> And please post back the results!
>
>
>
> On 12/6/07, Tyree, David <david.tyree AT sgmc DOT org> wrote:
> >
> >            We are testing Vista and I'm seeing something odd. TSM
> seems
> > to want to do almost a full backup every time it runs automatically.
> >
> >            I'm running the 5.5.0 client on a VMware (6.0) Vista
> > Ultimate box that is talking to a TSM server running 5.4.1 on Windows.
> >
> >            The backup on the Vista machine is automated using the
> > DSMCAD service. The incremental backup kicks off at the correct time,
> > but it ends up doing a full backup.
> >
> >            I've looked through the dsmsched log on the Vista machine
> > and I'm seeing where it has contacted the TSM server and picked up the
> > schedule name and the action. The schedule name is correct and the
> > action is set to incremental. And several lines in the dsmsched log
> > mention "Incremental backup of '\\is-vista-test-d\c$' finished".
> >
> >            The log shows everything just like what I would expect to
> > say, the issue is that it ends up backing up almost 8 gigs of files
> each
> > time the backup runs. I've run scheduled incremental backups almost
> back
> > to back on the machine and it picks up 8 gigs each time. The machine
> is
> > just sitting there between backups; I'm not doing anything on the
> > machine in between.
> >
> >            If I open the GUI and tag the c drive for incremental
> backup
> > it goes out and looks at all the files on the drive and backs up a few
> > dozen files and it done. Just like I would expect it to.
> >
> >            If I go to the baclient folder and run "dsmc incr" from the
> > command line it ends up doing what looks like a full backup.
> >
> >
> >
> >            In the last couple of hours I had a scheduled backup run
> > that moved about 8 gigs worth of files. Right after that finished I
> did
> > a c drive backup from the GUI. It moved a few hundred megs of files.
> > Right behind that I did the "dsmc incr". So far it's moved over 4 gig
> of
> > files and is still running.
> >
> >
> >
> >            Anybody got a idea what's going on here?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >            PS, Vista looks good.  Except most of our software doesn't
> > run. The UAC (User Account Control) is a real piece of work. And they
> > have moved everything around so you can't find what you're looking
> for.
> > But at least it looks good....
> >
> > David Tyree
> > Interface Analyst
> > South Georgia Medical Center
> > 229.333.1155
> >
> > Confidential Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is
> > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> > confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review,
> use,
> > disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
> > recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
> > copies of the original message.
> >
> >
> >
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>