ADSM-L

To DirMC, or not to DirMC

2006-07-21 16:30:49
Subject: To DirMC, or not to DirMC
From: Orville Lantto <orville.lantto AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:30:19 -0400
I was looking over some recent TechNotes and ran into two contradictory items.
 
TechNote 1154049 "TSM server storage--Handling of client directory objects" 
preaches the old religion of using a separate management class and disk pool 
for Windows and Novell directory objects to speed restore.
 
TechNote 1240913 "DIRMC has little effect on restore performance" makes the 
case that DIRMC is obsolete and unnecessary.  
 
These two TechNotes are both dated within the last month.
 
Anybody from IBM want to clear this up?
 
Orville L. Lantto
Glasshouse Technologies, Inc.
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>