To DirMC, or not to DirMC
2006-07-21 16:30:49
I was looking over some recent TechNotes and ran into two contradictory items.
TechNote 1154049 "TSM server storage--Handling of client directory objects"
preaches the old religion of using a separate management class and disk pool
for Windows and Novell directory objects to speed restore.
TechNote 1240913 "DIRMC has little effect on restore performance" makes the
case that DIRMC is obsolete and unnecessary.
These two TechNotes are both dated within the last month.
Anybody from IBM want to clear this up?
Orville L. Lantto
Glasshouse Technologies, Inc.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- To DirMC, or not to DirMC,
Orville Lantto <=
|
|
|