ADSM-L

Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?

2002-09-24 21:06:52
Subject: Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?
From: Joel Fuhrman <joelf AT CAC.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:05:39 -0700
I found that the SYSTEM OBJECT which were not unicode were never deleted
unless I did it manually.  A QUERY OCC * "SYSTEM OBJECT" (without the
NAMETYPE=UNICODE option) will let you know if you have that problem.  Also,
did you run the command CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPS?  For me, on 5.1.1.4 it ran but
never cleaned everything up and it wouldn't run on 5.1.1.6.  I finally had
to do an AUDITDB FIX=YES.

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Gretchen L. Thiele wrote:

> Hi Fred,
>
> I just took a v4.2.2.12 AIX server to v5.1.1.6 last Saturday.
> All I can say is 'not pretty'. This is due to the SYSTEM OBJECT
> problem. If you don't know what this is, you will soon if you
> have WinXP and Win2K clients backing up to v4 and pre v5.1.1.6
> servers.
>
> The basic problem is that TSM isn't expiring anything in the
> SYSTEM OBJECTs filespace. Some of our clients had over 20GB
> in these filespaces! Needless to say, the database blew up
> while trying to find out what was going on.
>
> To see if you have this problem, you can type in
>
> show version <nodename> "SYSTEM OBJECT" namet=uni > file
>
> (only use namet=uni if the filespace is unicode). Then
> check through the file and look for the number of occurrences
> of a file, say ROUTE.EXE. A normal SYSTEM OBJECT filespace,
> with four versions, shouldn't be over a gig.
>
> The good news is that v5.1.1.6 does NOT have the SYSTEM
> OBJECT problem and the new server is doing very well.
>
> I am writing up the post mortem on the conversion and will
> post to the list later this week (at the request of Tivoli
> level 2).
>
> Gretchen Thiele
> Princeton University
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>