Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?
2002-09-24 12:24:46
At 10:55 AM 9/24/02 -0400, you wrote:
Hi Fred,
>I've seen the SYSTEM OBJECT problem, it's especially pretty when you can't
>run expiration for six weeks.
It's a pain, I've got a routine set up to find the oversized SYSTEM
OBJECT filespaces and then delete them, but I have two servers with
thousands of WinXP/2K nodes that bloated the databases up to 250GB.
I'm just trying to stay above water on these two and then just move
the nodes to a v5 server for a big 'do over'. Sigh.
Bottom line, get your SYSTEM OBJECT filesystems in check now!
>But I haven't had a scheduled session
>accepted since I hit MAXSESS at 3:04 yesterday morning. Are you seeing
>this in 5.1.1.6?
Not sure what problem you are seeing. If all of your sessions are in
use, i.e., you've hit MAXSESS, I wouldn't expect any scheduled
sessions to get in. Or am I missing something?
Gretchen Thiele
Princeton University
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Fred Johanson
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Ted Byrne
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Doug Thorneycroft
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, David Longo
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Magura, Curtis
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Jolliff, Dale
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Rushforth, Tim
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Andrew Raibeck
|
|
|