ADSM-L

Re: Using a Primary Disk Storage Pool as Staging for Disaster Rec over y

2002-05-28 13:47:54
Subject: Re: Using a Primary Disk Storage Pool as Staging for Disaster Rec over y
From: asr AT UFL DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 13:45:24 -0400
=> On Fri, 24 May 2002 11:22:01 -0400, "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT 
COM> said:

> Yes, it will require all the inactive files to come back.  But, the DR
> vendor can provide enough disk.  They cannot provide 30 tape drives.  So
> with about 8 tape drives restoring the pool in about 18 hours (estimate for
> 5TB), we will then be able to do parallel restore of 180 servers.


Here's a method that does not require all the inactive files to come back:

Instead of a really-huge DISK pool, use that space for a really huge FILE
devclass.

Instead of RESTORE STGPOOL, on a per-storagepool basis, do a GENERATE
BACKUPSET to your file devclass; this may be on a per-node granularity, or if
you've got some really large filespaces, you may want to break them out.

You can run as many of these as you have primary-tape devices, and you
sidestep the possibility of your tape running faster than your network, and
having to stop and re-seek; it's tape to "local" disk.

You can start generating backupsets as soon as you are aware of the failure;
actually _reading_ those backupsets will run efficiently up to your network
capacity.  You also dodge a bunch of TSM database contention.


Allen S. Rout
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>