Most unpanaca like.  I naively assumed that the dual copy would merge
backup streams from multiple nodes within collocation limits.



_____________________________
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc





Andy Carlson <andyc AT ANDYC.CARENET DOT ORG>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
03/12/2002 01:07 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: TSM 5.1


#2 is not the panacea that it sounds like.  The dual writes to the
copypool's happens during session data transfer to disk pool - thus, you
must have a tape drive per session doing the dual write.

Andy Carlson                             |\      _,,,---,,_
andyc AT andyc.carenet DOT org            ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_
BJC Health System                       |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri                    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)
Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html

On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Richard L. Rhodes wrote:

> We had a meeting with IBM last week where they described some of the
> new features of 5.1 - coming within a few weeks.
>
> 1)  multi session restore
> 2)  simultaneous writes to copy pools (more than one)
> 3)  a "move nodedata" command
> 4)  lan-free backup/restore (I thought it already had this)
> 5)  hpux lan-free
>