1. Forum Rules (PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ BEFORE POSTING) Click the link to access ADSM.ORG Acceptable Use Policy and forum rules which should be observed when using this website. Violators may be banned from this website. This message will disappear after you have made at least 12 posts. Thank you for your cooperation.

What platform are you planning to run TSM v6.3 Server on?

Discussion in 'TSM Server' started by jharris, Apr 10, 2012.

?

What platform are you planning to run TSM v6.3 Server on?

  1. AIX

    52.2%
  2. Linux x86_64

    25.9%
  3. Linux on System-Z

    1.9%
  4. Linux on Power

    1.1%
  5. Windows x86_64

    33.0%
  6. HP-UX

    0.4%
  7. Oracle Solaris

    4.4%
Multiple votes are allowed.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jharris

    jharris New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Victoria, Australia
    As this poll ( http://adsm.org/forum/showthread.php?12365 ) is now four years old and TSM v6.3 now drops supports for native zOS and 32 bit operating systems, I'd like to hear from those planning to upgrade to TSM v6.3 or have already upgraded as to what TSM server platform they are going to use.
    We are looking at upgrading TSM 5.5 from Win64 and seriously want to deploy TSM v6.3 on AIX, but are getting a big management push to invest more infrastructure onto our Z-Linux infrastructure.
     
  2.  
  3. jharris

    jharris New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Victoria, Australia
    Quite a few votes, not much discussion though... I'm interested in also knowing whether the size of your organisation determins your choice ... ie are most of you coming from larger organisations > 1000 node registrations, medium with 100 to 1000 node registrations or small < 100 node registrations.

    We're on Windows with 2000 node registrations and still think AIX on System P would be the best choice for scalability of TSM, but Windows does make a strong case with the initial purchase cost. It also can be a case of the 'Devil you know', considering we have no AIX supported applications running here at the moment.
     
  4. drivechip

    drivechip Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    5
    I would not go for AIX as long you have no skills. I think TSM doesn't scale on Windows worse. Today X64 Intel Servers have a good performance and allows to install multiple TSM instances on the same server.

    There is also a TSM licensing point of view where AIX on pSeries might be better depending on your licensing model.
     
  5. moon-buddy

    moon-buddy Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    274
    Occupation:
    Electronics Engineer, Security Professional
    Location:
    Somewhere in the US
    I had the benefit of working on most platforms: AIX, Linux, UNIX (Solaris), OS2, Windows, Mainframe and Novell. Since there has never been a TSM server for OS2 and Novell, I would not know how TSM would have performed on these two environments.

    Putting this aside and all things equal (money to spend, backup demand exist, etc), I would really run TSM on AIX in a heartbeat - so stable and very easy to maintain. The last would be Windows - not that it is the least stable but the so many patches that you need to apply and reboot the server. This becomes so annoying. And there are so many memory leaks.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2012
  6. rowl

    rowl Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    8
    Just in the final phases of upgrading an environment from TSM 5.5 to TSM 6.3. We had a mix of AIX and RH Linux, now we are using only SuSE Linux. While several of us would prefer to use AIX, that platform is being phased out in our environment. So our choices were Windows or Linux. Given those options Linux was the natural choice. Not that Windows is bad, but for infrastructure like backup I don't want a platform that needs reboots for patches every couple weeks.

    A couple years back we eliminated physical tape from the environment, and with this project we eliminated virtual tape as well. Now backups are going directly to Data Domain storage over nfs connected with 10Gb Ethernet. So far, we are very happy with this configuration.

    -Rowl
     
    Godzilla likes this.
  7. KB

    KB Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2002
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    8
    Occupation:
    Client Technical Professional
    I started with ADSM on OS/2, server. It was very good to me.
     
  8. mikeymac

    mikeymac Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    27
    Location:
    Syracuse, NY
    Our Engineering team is looking at migrating our TSM servers from AIX to Windows (for very reasonable cost considerations). Besides the issue that others have raised with the need for frequent reboots, I'm concerned about Windows' poor device management. On the up-side, my team doesn't have "root" access to any of our AIX instances, but we do have Administrator access to every Windows server instance. So it'll be nice to have more control over the environment.
     
  9. moon-buddy

    moon-buddy Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    274
    Occupation:
    Electronics Engineer, Security Professional
    Location:
    Somewhere in the US
    I did not know that TSM did run on OS/2 - now if you guys will resurrect OS/2, I would galdly run TSM on it! :)
     
  10. sdhotre

    sdhotre New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2014
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Unix sys admin
    Data domian

    I agree AIX is the best platform to run on as I have worked on it over number of years. I thought Data domian is a also virtual tape .
     
  11. sdhotre

    sdhotre New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2014
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Unix sys admin
    AIX anytime !
     
: 6.3, platform, poll, server
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page