• Please help support our sponsors by considering their products and services.
    Our sponsors enable us to serve you with this high-speed Internet connection and fast webservers you are currently using at ADSM.ORG.
    They support this free flow of information and knowledge exchange service at no cost to you.

    Please welcome our latest sponsor Tectrade . We can show our appreciation by learning more about Tectrade Solutions
  • Community Tip: Please Give Thanks to Those Sharing Their Knowledge.

    If you receive helpful answer on this forum, please show thanks to the poster by clicking "LIKE" link for the answer that you found helpful.


    Click the link above to access ADSM.ORG Acceptable Use Policy and forum rules which should be observed when using this website. Violators may be banned from this website. This notice will disappear after you have made at least 3 posts.

move data and reclamation


ADSM.ORG Senior Member
Mar 15, 2017
Reaction score
Ok as long as you ran pct_reclaim>85 in the query we should be good. That's looking at tapes that are 15% utilized, or has 85% 'free space' so to speak after expiration and what not has ran.
With the 5 scratch tapes to work with and 14 tapes with pct_reclaim higher than 85, we should be able to get those to come back as scratch once your reuse delay is taken into consideration.
I'd recommend updating the copy pool from what marclant said here:
Starting off, I think you should be able to update the Reclamation Threshold to well...85 and then run a protect storagepool with the reclaim=only. That should return those 14 tapes to scratch after using one or more tapes (depending on number of protect processes you have defined). You should see a summary and worker threads start. It is generally advisable not to cancel that process. So, if you don't want to dedicate time (no idea how fast you are able to write to tape) to run at 85%, set it higher to say 95, then 90, then 85. Just slowly step it down to free up tapes. And after each step, run a new protect process with reclaim=only

Now, if for some reason those tapes won't reclaim, I highly suggest starting a case with IBM. I have had some issues with directory copy container pools on tape, but the thoughts are around the fact that I was on 7.1.x code at the time.

I'm out traveling for a few days so likely won't be able to respond right away.
Take care!

Advertise at ADSM.ORG

If you are reading this, so are your potential customer. Advertise at ADSM.ORG right now.

UpCloud high performance VPS at $5/month

Get started with $25 in credits on Cloud Servers. You must use link below to receive the credit. Use the promo to get upto 5 month of FREE Linux VPS.

The Spectrum Protect TLA (Three-Letter Acronym): ISP or something else?

  • Every product needs a TLA, Let's call it ISP (IBM Spectrum Protect).

    Votes: 20 19.0%
  • Keep using TSM for Spectrum Protect.

    Votes: 63 60.0%
  • Let's be formal and just say Spectrum Protect

    Votes: 13 12.4%
  • Other (please comement)

    Votes: 9 8.6%

Forum statistics

Latest member