1. Forum Rules (PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ BEFORE POSTING) Click the link to access ADSM.ORG Acceptable Use Policy and forum rules which should be observed when using this website. Violators may be banned from this website. This message will disappear after you have made at least 12 posts. Thank you for your cooperation.

Lin_tape and Control Point Failover

Discussion in 'Tape / Media Library' started by dmarsee, Nov 6, 2009.

  1. dmarsee

    dmarsee New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Greetings. I have a RHEL 4 box running TSM 5.4.3.0 using lin_tape(d) 1.23.0 and ibmatl 6.7.5.0 to access a shared 3584 library managed by another TSM server. I've added the appropriate options line to /etc/modprobe.conf to implement tape path and control point failover, and while the tape path failover looks fine:

    cat /proc/scsi/IBMtape
    lin_tape version: 1.23.0
    lin_tape major number: 253
    Attached Tape Devices:
    Number model SN HBA FO Path
    0 03592J1A 000001234567 qla2xxx Primary
    1 03592J1A 000002345678 qla2xxx Primary
    2 03592J1A 000003456789 qla2xxx Primary
    3 03592J1A 000004567890 qla2xxx Primary
    4 03592J1A 000001234567 qla2xxx Alternate
    5 03592J1A 000002345678 qla2xxx Alternate
    6 03592J1A 000003456789 qla2xxx Alternate
    7 03592J1A 000004567890 qla2xxx Alternate

    the control point failover does not:

    cat /proc/scsi/IBMchanger
    lin_tape version: 1.23.0
    lin_tape major number: 253
    Attached Tape Devices:
    Number model SN HBA FO Path
    0 03584L22 0000000A12345678 qla2xxx NA
    1 03584L22 0000000A12345678 qla2xxx NA

    It sees both paths to the library, but does not set them up as a Primary-Alternate pair like I expected or as the docs say it should. The 3584 library does have the failover path feature code installed. Is this what I should be seeing since this server is not the library manager, or should I see the Primary-Alternate failover paths anyway, or does it even matter if it's set up Primary-Alternate or not since it shows both paths to the library control point? I am planning to migrate the library manager function to this TSM server, but am hesitant to do so until I have this control point failover question resolved. Any insight is appreciated.

    Regards,

    Dmarsee
     
  2.  
  3. moon-buddy

    moon-buddy Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,257
    Likes Received:
    282
    Occupation:
    Electronics Engineer, Security Professional
    Location:
    Somewhere in the US
    I believe that what you are seeing is correct since as you said "since this server is not the library manager".
     
: lin_tape

Share This Page