1. Forum Rules (PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ BEFORE POSTING) Click the link to access ADSM.ORG Acceptable Use Policy and forum rules which should be observed when using this website. Violators may be banned from this website. This message will disappear after you have made at least 12 posts. Thank you for your cooperation.

incremental vs full

Discussion in 'Exchange / Outlook' started by oskie, Jun 9, 2009.

  1. oskie

    oskie New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    System Technician
    Can anyone give any recommendation regarding the number of incremental vs number of full backups for Exchange? I'm considering the following setups:

    full weekly: 1 Full + 6 Incr
    full biweekly: 1 Full + 13 Incr
    full monthly: 1 Full + 27-30 Incr

    For sake of simplicity, assume all data is stored on disk on TSM server...

    Regards,

    Oskar
     
  2.  
  3. Harry_Redl

    Harry_Redl Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,268
    Likes Received:
    135
    Occupation:
    IT Consultant
    Location:
    Czech Republic
    Hi,

    it depends on expected recovery time. I am not sure if there is any limitation in Exchange so you cannot take more than (BIG NUMBER) incrementals, but when restoring, you allways need the last full and then you need to restore AND APPLY all logs. It can be really time consuming task. So check your SLAs for answer.

    Harry
     
  4. moon-buddy

    moon-buddy Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    279
    Occupation:
    Electronics Engineer, Security Professional
    Location:
    Somewhere in the US
    I would recommend your proposed full weekly.

    Based on my experience, restores will be a lot faster in this scenario. However, a daily (or less incremental like 3 incr, 1 full, etc.) FULL is ideal BUT not always practical if you have a big database.
     

Share This Page