Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Best Practice - Virus Scanning on windows FS's.

2008-04-24 09:06:26
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Best Practice - Virus Scanning on windows FS's.
From: Jason Slagle <raistlin AT tacorp DOT net>
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
Hi guys,

I have a windows file server I am currently backing up that I am 
expierencing very low throughput on.

The volume in question is a 3.3TB partition with about 2.6TB in use.

It's currently taking 66 hours to do a full of this file system to an LTO 
4 tape.

This is a network based backup.

I've been doing tuning, and the network path is clean (The exchange server 
in the same rack on the same switch gets 8-9x the performance when it 
gets backed up) - it's gig-e all the way and is unloaded.

One thing I was considering is that this may be an issue with the Virus 
scanner.  Being a file server this contains a TON of files (9.8 million 
files totaling 2.9TB), and I'm wondering if the virus scanner is causing 
this.

The tuning guide suggests I should turn anti-virus off, but my security 
director balked at this idea.

I was wondering what some of you with "way more data" than I have do.  Do 
you run virus scan on your fileservers?  Do you back them up in a 
different way than I do?  I need single file recovery.

Any other tuning advice you can give?

Jason

-- 
Jason Slagle
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ /   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
  X  - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
/ \ - NO Word docs in e-mail .

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>