Re: [Networker] ALL Clients suddenly started failing
2008-10-06 10:13:09
Goslin, Paul wrote:
I was afraid of this.... Of course it's working flawlessly now....
Whomever decided to make Networker dependent on an outside service like DNS made a very foolish decision IMHO... In a Disaster Recovery situation, you're not always going to have DNS up and working, it's just one more requirement you have to provide for and sometimes it can be very hard to provide. Making your BACKUPS DEPENDANT on DNS is STUPID !!! I liked the old EMC EDM product where you maintained your own host file for client name resolution and did not depend on an outside service like DNS. Backup processes and procedures should be self-sufficient , period ....
That's a rather naive comment. The whole Internet depends on DNS, as do
most company networks. It's not just NetWorker that depends on it.
If you really want to, you can run NetWorker entirely with hosts files,
it will work without DNS, that's if you want to waste most of your
working time maintaining dozens or hundreds of hosts files, keeping them
in sync, tracking down discrepancies etc. I have worked in such an
environment and can say with confidence that DNS is preferable.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|