Networker

Re: [Networker] Dedicated Storage Node vs. Storage Node

2007-10-05 08:36:54
Subject: Re: [Networker] Dedicated Storage Node vs. Storage Node
From: "Faidherbe, Thierry" <Thierry.Faidherbe AT HP DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:29:10 -0000
Hi,

The difference is the price, functionalities are the same 
excepted dedicated storage node lic is to be used for nodes, 
as you described, that backup just their own data on 
locally attached networker-managed devices (disk or tape, SCSI or FC,
may the devices be physical or virtual, ....). 

If these storage nodes have also to write on tape/disk 
data from other clients, you need full storage node license.

The way to force DSN/SN selection is at device level :
look at "dedicated storage node" field.

HTH

Th

Kind regards - Bien cordialement - Vriendelijke groeten,

Thierry FAIDHERBE

HP Services - Storage Division
Tru64 Unix and Legato Enterprise Backup Solutions Consultant
                                  
 *********       *********  HEWLETT  PACKARD SPRL/BVBA
 *******    h      *******  Hermeslaan, 1a
 ******    h        ******  B-1831 Diegem 
 *****    hhhh  pppp *****  BELGIUM
 *****   h  h  p  p  *****     
 *****  h  h  pppp   *****  Phone :    +32 (0)2  / 729.85.42  
 ******      p      ******  Mobile :   +32 (0)498/  94.60.85  
 *******    p      *******  Fax :      +32 (0)2  / 290.15.49
 *********       *********  Email/MSN : thierry.faidherbe(at)hp.com     
                                  Internet  : http://www.hp.com/
      I  N  V  E  N  T           
                                
      Enterprise number 0402.220.594  RPM/RPR Brussels           

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Willett, Jr., Edward W. (Contractor)
Sent: vendredi 5 octobre 2007 14:14
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Dedicated Storage Node vs. Storage Node

In my environment we have several large clients (500+ GB) that are
backing up through the backup server at this time.  We are planning on
implementing either disk backups or a VTL and at that time we are going
to make these large clients storage nodes to take advantage of the 4GB/s
fiber that will be installed with whichever solution we decide on.  My
question is since these clients are only going to backing themselves up
does it make more since to make them dedicated storage nodes rather than
just storage nodes.  What are the advantages and disadvantages to each
approach.  I'm looking for real experiences rather than what is
documented out on EMC's web site.  I appreciate any input that anyone
can provide.
 
Eddie

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>