Networker

Re: [Networker] Dedicated Storage Node vs. Storage Node

2007-10-05 09:05:10
Subject: Re: [Networker] Dedicated Storage Node vs. Storage Node
From: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:56:27 -0400
On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:14 AM, Willett, Jr., Edward W. (Contractor) wrote:

In my environment we have several large clients (500+ GB) that are
backing up through the backup server at this time.  We are planning on
implementing either disk backups or a VTL and at that time we are going to make these large clients storage nodes to take advantage of the 4GB/s
fiber that will be installed with whichever solution we decide on.  My
question is since these clients are only going to backing themselves up does it make more since to make them dedicated storage nodes rather than
just storage nodes.  What are the advantages and disadvantages to each
approach.  I'm looking for real experiences rather than what is
documented out on EMC's web site.  I appreciate any input that anyone
can provide.

If each of these clients will only back up itself, there's no point in paying the extra licensing cost to make them full storage nodes. Making them dedicated storage nodes will accomplish your goals at the lowest cost.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>