Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs
2005-07-21 05:19:59
I noticed that I was a little behind with my patch 113277-24. I'm downloading
the latest patch 113277-35 and will install it on Saturday.
I will keep this mailing list informed if I notice an improvement on the long
term.
Thanks
Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion
[mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]On Behalf Of Moore, Joe
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 4:40 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs
We had a similar problem with our SDLT600 drives (but they were
SAN-attached).
There's a Sun patch that might help: 113277. From the release notes:
(from 113277-27)
5103484 HP LTO-3 (Ultrium 3) Support Required Natively in st tape target
driver
6183286 SDLTx20 I/O timeout value inadequate
--Joe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Legato NetWorker discussion
> [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On Behalf Of Browning, David
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:30 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs
>
> We had a similar problem about a year ago, and it turns out
> that there was a
> problem with the firmware on our tape library. It was
> allowing the tape
> drive to reset itself in the middle of writing. It took
> several dumps of
> the tape library to find it.
>
> Not sure if your problem is the same, just something to look at.
>
> David M. Browning Jr.
> LSUHSC Enterprise Network Operations/Help Desk
> (504) 568-4364 - Direct
> (504) 914-7550 - Cell
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Legato NetWorker discussion
> [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
> Behalf Of Bolay, Vincent
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 4:37 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs
>
> Hello,
>
> This is my config:
>
> SunOS lau-backup2-b 5.9 Generic_117171-05 sun4u sparc
> SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R
> Patch: 113277-24 SunOS 5.9: st, sd and ssd Patch
> Sun StorEdge(TM) Enterprise Backup 7.2.Build.172 Network Edition/35
> Storagetek Library L80 with Quantum SDLT320 drives firmware
> rev 80, SCSI LVD
>
> I often get the following messages:
>
> /nsr/logs/daemon.log:
>
> 07/20/05 01:32:41 nsrd: media notice: sdlt320 tape DEX066 on
> /dev/rmt/0ubn
> is full
> 07/20/05 01:32:41 nsrd: media notice: sdlt320 tape DEX066
> used 28 GB of 160
> GB capacity
> 07/20/05 01:32:59 nsrd: media notice: Volume "DEX066" on device
> "/dev/rmt/0ubn": Block size is 32768 bytes not 131072 bytes.
> Verify the
> device configuration. Tape positioning by record is disabled.
>
> /var/adm/messages:
>
> Jul 20 01:32:41 lau-backup2-b scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING:
> /pci@8,700000/pci@1/scsi@2/st@1,0 (st50):
> Jul 20 01:32:41 lau-backup2-b Error for Command: write
> Error Level: Fatal
> Jul 20 01:32:41 lau-backup2-b scsi: [ID 107833 kern.notice]
> Requested
> Block: 9579 Error Block: 9579
> Jul 20 01:32:41 lau-backup2-b scsi: [ID 107833 kern.notice]
> Vendor:
> QUANTUM Serial Number: P i
> Jul 20 01:32:41 lau-backup2-b scsi: [ID 107833 kern.notice]
> Sense Key:
> Media Error
> Jul 20 01:32:41 lau-backup2-b scsi: [ID 107833 kern.notice]
> ASC: 0xc
> (write error), ASCQ: 0x0, FRU: 0x0
>
> It can happen on any drive and with new or used tapes. The
> tapes are labeled
> always the same way.
> I know that this is a known issue, but nobody (Sun,
> Sunmamagers, Google) has
> been able to provide a solution yet.
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Bolay, Vincent
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Browning, David
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Bolay, Vincent
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Moore, Joe
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Reed, Irene
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Browning, David
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Bolay, Vincent
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs,
Bolay, Vincent <=
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Bolay, Vincent
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Bolay, Vincent
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Alain Richard
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Bolay, Vincent
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Brian J. Greenberg
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Robert Maiello
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Bolay, Vincent
- Re: [Networker] Tapes marked full after a few gigs, Maiello, Robert
|
|
|