Networker

Re: [Networker] Multiple NIC configuration

2005-01-07 13:13:00
Subject: Re: [Networker] Multiple NIC configuration
From: Robert Maiello <robert.maiello AT PFIZER DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:12:09 -0500
Lost track in the thread here.. would a Networker client connection get
confused under a simple setup (multiple independent NICS on the same LAN-
no trunking).  I would think the outbound NIC server name (despite being
in the client's servers file) might confuse a Networker save session;
ie.. a reply comes back from different server name than it was initiated
on?  Was that the point being made here?

Multiple NICs on the same LAN seems good from a central admin point of
view;  one could manually load balance backup traffic based on storage
node name (or backup server interface name ) without having to move clients
to a different backup LAN.


Robert Maiello
Pioneer Data Systems

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:51:48 -0800, Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM> 
wrote:

>>
>> Darren,
>> In my experience unless the router table is set to force traffic outbound
>> connections from a multiple NIC Sun will use a "least used" algorithm to
>> select between usable NICs this may be maintained for a particular session
>> but is not guaranteed to be the same the next time a connection is made,
>> and I believe that every Save set will use its own connection.
>
>Certainly if IPMP is used, then individual TCP connections will hash.
>
>In the past, I've used many systems with multiple nics on the same
>subnet without IPMP and usually one of them has almost no outbound
>traffic.  All the traffic was using the other interface.
>
>This behavior may have changed with some release or patch, but I don't
>have a box I can use to test it right now.
>
>--
>Darren Dunham                                           ddunham AT taos DOT com
>Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS            http://www.taos.com/
>Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
>         < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
>should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=