ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2 Admin Center and IE 7.

2011-05-04 13:35:45
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2 Admin Center and IE 7.
From: Dave Canan <ddcanan AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 10:28:15 -0700
Wanda, Wei Ji is correct on her post. IE8 "might" be working with the
current level of AC, but it is NOT supported. The next release of TSM (V6.3)
and the AC that comes with it WILL support IE8. IE9 will not yet be
supported with V6.3.

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Prather, Wanda <wPrather AT icfi DOT com> wrote:

> Dave:  Does that mean that TSM 6.2 AC is now SUPPORTED on IE8?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of
> Dave Canan
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 8:01 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2 Admin Center and IE 7.
>
> There's nothing wrong with your workstation. This is a known problem, and
> the issue here is with the javescript engine that is in IE. It is REALLY bad
> in IE6, a little better in IE7, and even better with IE8. But I would stick
> with FF for now.
>
> Dave Canan
> IBM ATS TSM Performance
> ddcananATUSDOTIBMDOTCOM
> 916-723-2410
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Vandeventer, Harold [BS] <
> Harold.Vandeventer AT da.ks DOT gov> wrote:
>
> > I've installed TSM 6.2.2 and its related Admin Center on powerful
> > Windows
> > 2008 R2 servers.
> >
> > My issue seems to be using IE 7 as the interface to Admin Center.  It
> > takes up to a minute to change tabs from Storage Devices to Manage
> Servers.
> >  Similar delays and frequent "script timeout" errors when changing
> > from one area to another or clicking "update table".
> >
> > I looked at Admin Center server performance a bit (CPU%, etc) but
> > didn't see any obvious roadblocks.
> >
> > On a whim, I tried Firefox 3.6.10.  The difference: nearly
> > instantaneous refresh of the Admin Center screens using Firefox.
> >
> > Is anyone else seeing a similar behavior or is it just my workstation?
> >
> > Thanks for any comments; Harold.
> >
>