ADSM-L

Re: Why so many Filling tapes?

2003-02-04 06:39:31
Subject: Re: Why so many Filling tapes?
From: Burak Demircan <burak.demircan AT DAIMLERCHRYSLER DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:39:21 +0100
do these tapes belong to copy pools? they are not waited in the library and 
sent immediately offsite 
after the "backup of your primary stg" 
regards 

 
Burak Demircan 
Mercedes-Benz Turk A.S 
CEO / ITT 
Phone: +90 - 212 4823500 (ext .4676) 
Fax :+90 212 481 11 54 
  



                
        rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU 
        Sent by: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 
        
        04.02.2003 13:14 
        Please respond to ADSM-L 
                        
                        To:        ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 
                        cc:         
                        Subject:        Why so many Filling tapes?

I have a non-collocated sequential (tape) storage pool. Why should there
ever be more than one tape in Filling status? I have four. Why can't it
fill one up and then start another? These are Super-DLT tapes, so each
one means something - 200gb compressed.
 
I understand why I have lots of Filling tapes in a collocated tape pool
- that's the whole idea of collocation. But this is happening in a
non-collocated tape pool.
 
Roger Deschner      University of Illinois at Chicago     rogerd AT uic DOT edu
== "Sometimes it pays to stay in bed on Monday, rather than spending ===
===== the rest of the week debugging Monday's code." -Dan Salomon ======
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>