Re: Reclaimstgpool(s) and one tape drive reclamation
2000-03-14 16:38:49
Yes, I would like to use a large disk/file area to reclaim offsite
vols.
I would also like to see the availability of reclaim-stg-pool that
went from onsite/primary to FILE on disk and then to DISKPOOL
so that it can be 'migrated' with 'normal' data.
You can point a onsite/primary to a reclaimstgpool but the reclaimstgpool
when point 'back' to a diskpool (that points to the original
onsite/primary causes an error to occur during the move-back migration.
sigh! .. .. joe.f.
Joseph A Faracchio, Systems Programmer, UC Berkeley
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Talafous, John G. wrote:
> Trying to minimize the number of tape drives used for reclamation, I wish to
> establish reclaim-storage-pools for all
> tape storage pools. I find that I cannot define a reclaimstgpool for a copy
> storage pool. Doesn't this seem odd?
> A copy storage pool would generally be offsite. Reclaiming that storage pool
> would require processing the files from the original tapes. Wouldn't a
> reclaim-storage-pool seem to be ideal for this? Is this something that might
> be useful to others? Is anyone using reclaim-storage-pools for one tape
> reclamation? Comments and suggestions, please.
>
> John G. Talafous Sr. Tech. Prog/Anal
> The Timken Company Phone: (330)-471-3390
> P.O. Box 6927 Fax : (330)-471-4034
> 1835 Dueber Ave. S.W.
> Canton, Ohio USA 44706-0927
> talafous AT timken DOT com http://www.timken.com/
>
|
|
|