Re: ADSM Bottleneck
1999-08-19 22:50:06
NT is your bottleneck !
Sorry for the strong way of saying, but scalability is not the strong point
for NT, so adding processors is not closer to linear (ideal) performance
growth.
I am not sure, but NT licensing for SMP systems and the NT system itself
may not be worth the performance gain.
If I were you I would add memory and try to distribute I/O through many
disk/tapes controllers. Probably results will be a lot better than just
adding another CPU.
good luck,
Rodrigo
>We are about to spec out a new ADSM server running NT on the Intel platfor
>We are interested in opinions of what are the main bottlenecks for ADSM
>performance. For instance, would adding multiple processors increase
>performance (especially ADSM DB) or is memory more important. Thanks in
>advance.
>Seth Forgosh
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- ADSM Bottleneck, Forgosh, Seth
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Norrgard, Nathan
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Ruth Mitchell
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Jordan, Chris (ELS)
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Louie, James
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, arhoads
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck,
Rodrigo Cordovil Gazzaneo <=
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Jordan, Chris (ELS)
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Simon Watson
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Joshua Bassi
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Rodrigo Cordovil Gazzaneo
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Rodrigo Cordovil Gazzaneo
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Joel Fuhrman
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Remeta, Mark
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Remeta, Mark
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Mauro M. TINELLI
- Re: ADSM Bottleneck, Richard Sims
|
|
|