Re: Re[2]: Win 95 Scheduler
1998-09-09 15:37:58
We have had no known problems with this approach.
IBM, from what I hear, is looking at changing this "DOS"
approach. Of course as ridiculous as ADSM is for using
a DOS box it is also ridiculous for corporations or any business for
that matter
to be using Windows 95. We use Windows 95 and I have fought it all the
way.
Good luck!
CR
________________________
Cris Robinson
Senior Technical Analyst
Desktop Services Technical Support
Liberty Mutual Insurance
603.431.8400.54837
cris.robinson AT libertymutual DOT com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Nemeth [SMTP:laz AT SYBASE DOT COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 1998 5:28 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: Win 95 Scheduler
>
> any side affects from disabling the warn if still active?
>
>
>
> laz
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Win 95 Scheduler, Mark R Lines
- Re: Win 95 Scheduler, Dave Larimer
- Re: Re[2]: Win 95 Scheduler, Matt Cleland
- Re[2]: Win 95 Scheduler, Eric LEWIS
- Re: Re[2]: Win 95 Scheduler, Anthony Jones
- Re: Re[2]: Win 95 Scheduler, Robinson, Cris
- Re: Re[2]: Win 95 Scheduler, Laszlo Nemeth
- Re: Re[2]: Win 95 Scheduler,
Robinson, Cris <=
- Re: Re[2]: Win 95 Scheduler, Jackson, Sandye
|
|
|